Submission Methods
Accepted papers will be
published in the conference proceedings.
Accepted abstract will be
included in conference program, but will not published. Authors will be
invited to give an oral/poster presentation on site
-
Send the Full paper &
Abstract
Please contact with us
via bdee@bmail.org if
you have any questions
For accepted papers, one registration covers 6 pages
including tables, figures and references, and additional pages(＞6) will
be charged.
Policy on Multiple
Submissions
BDEE will not accept any
paper which, at the time of submission, is under review, is accepted for
publication, or has already been published in another conference or a
journal. Authors are also expected not to submit their papers elsewhere
during the BDEE reviewing period.
BDEE is utterly intolerant of plagiarism. Submitted papers are expected
to contain original work executed by the authors with adequate, proper
and scholarly citations to the work of others. It is the job of the
authors to clearly identify both their own contribution(s) and also
published results / techniques on which they depend or build. Reviewers
are charged to ensure these standards are met.
If the author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following
acts of sanction will be taken:
-
Reject the article
submitted or delete the article from the final publications.
-
Report the authors
violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s)
-
Report the authors
violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics
and research funding agency.
-
Reserve the right to
publish the authors name(s), the title of the article, the name(s)
of the affiliated institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of
the plagiarism.
Double-blind Peer Review
The double-blind peer
review process BDEE2025 used aims to maintain the integrity and quality
of academic publications by minimizing potential biases that could arise
from personal relationships, affiliations, or reputation. This approach
focuses the evaluation on the scientific merit of the work, helping to
ensure that only high-quality and well-researched articles are published
in the conference proceedings.
Reviewer Selection: The editors select experts in the field,
typically other researchers or academics, to review the manuscript.
These reviewers are chosen based on their expertise in the subject
matter of the article.
Blinding: In a double-blind review, the identities of the authors
and reviewers are concealed from each other. Authors do not know who is
reviewing their manuscript, and reviewers do not know the identities of
the authors.
Review Process: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript for its
quality, originality, methodology, relevance, and overall contribution
to the field. They provide feedback, suggestions, and recommendations
for improvements.
Decision: Based on the reviewers' feedback, the technical program
committee makes a decision on whether to accept the manuscript, request
revisions, or reject it. Authors receive feedback that helps them
improve the manuscript if revisions are requested.
Revisions and Resubmission: If revisions are requested, authors
make the necessary changes to address the reviewers' comments and
suggestions. The revised manuscript is then resubmitted.
Final Decision: The revised manuscript is re-evaluated by the
reviewers to ensure that the authors have adequately addressed the
feedback. A final decision is made regarding acceptance for publication.
|